7. Public Consultation Questions - Discretion 4
Discretion 4 - Article 2(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/927
Article 2(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/927 amends Article 6(3) of Directive 2009/65/EC as follows:
(2) Article 6 is amended as follows: (a) paragraph 3 is amended as follows: (i) in the first subparagraph, point (b), the following points are added: ‘(iii) reception and transmission of orders in relation to financial instruments; (iv) any other function or activity which is already provided by the management company in relation to a UCITS that it manages in accordance with this Article, or in relation to services that it provides in accordance with this paragraph, provided that any potential conflict of interest created by the provision of that function or activity to other parties is appropriately managed.’; (ii) in the first subparagraph, the following point is added: ‘(c) administration of benchmarks in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1011;’; (iii) the second subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘Management companies shall not be authorised under this Directive to provide only the services referred to in this paragraph. Management companies shall not be authorised to provide the services referred to in the first subparagraph, point (c), which are used in the UCITS that they manage.’; (b) paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: ‘4. Article 15, Article 16 except for paragraph 5, first subparagraph, and Articles 23, 24 and 25 of Directive 2014/65/EU shall apply where the services referred to in paragraph 3, points (a) and (b), of this Article are provided by management companies.’ |
Article 6 is part of Chapter III of Directive 2009/65/EC dealing with the obligations regarding UCITS management companies. Article 6 sets out the conditions for taking up activities as a UCITS management company. It states that management companies shall not engage in activities other than the management of UCITS, as per the functions set out in Annex II of the Directive, with the exception of the additional management of other collective investment undertakings which are not covered by the Directive and for which the management company is subject to prudential supervision but the units of which cannot be marketed in other Member States under the Directive.
Article 6(3) contains a derogation from Article 6(2) allowing Member States to authorise management companies to provide, in addition to the management of UCITS, the following services:
- management of portfolios of investments, including those owned by pension funds, in accordance with mandates given by investors on a discretionary, client-by-client basis, where such portfolios include one or more of the instruments listed in Annex I, Section C to Directive 2004/39/EC; and
- as non-core services comprising:
- investment advice concerning one or more of the instruments listed in Annex I, Section C to Directive 2004/39/EC;
- safe-keeping and administration in relation to units of collective investment undertakings.
This discretion was exercised in full by Ireland in domestic legislation. Under Regulation 16(2) of the European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) Regulations 2011, the Central Bank is permitted to assess and approve on a case-by-case basis any applications for authorisation it receives from management companies seeking to provide these additional “top-up” services.[1] Regulation 16(2)(b) provides that management companies cannot be authorised (i) to carry out “top-up” services only; or (ii) to carry out “non-core services” without also providing investment management services, as set out in Regulation 16(2)(a)(i). UCITS management companies can apply for authorisation to carry out these services either at the time they are seeking authorisation or separately post-authorisation.
The amendment proposed in Directive (EU) 2024/927 extends the “non-core services” provided by UCITS management companies under the derogation to include:
- the reception and transmission of orders in relation to financial instruments;
- the same functions and activities already provided by a management company in relation to a UCITS that it manages may be performed for the benefit of third parties, provided that any potential conflict of interest created by the provision of that function or activity to other parties is appropriately managed.
The amendment also provides that Member States may authorise management companies to offer the administration of benchmarks as an ancillary service.
This national discretion has materially widened in scope as a result of the amendments in Directive (EU) 2024/927 and it is being addressed in this public consultation in line with the Department’s transposition policy.
The possibility for a UCITS management company to undertake these activities could maintain or increase, to some degree, the competitiveness of the jurisdiction vis-à-vis other investment funds centres of excellence.
Ultimately, it would fall to the Central Bank to assess and decide whether to permit a UCITS management company to engage in these additional ancillary activities, should it receive any applications in this regard.
Question 4. Should Ireland exercise this discretion to extend the list of ancillary activities provided by a UCITS management company to include benchmark administration in accordance with Regulation 2016/1011/EU; and to clarify that “non-core services” under Article 6(3)(b) of the UCITS Directive may include the same functions and activities already provided by management companies in relation to UCITS that they manage and the reception and transmission of orders in relation to financial instruments? |